On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Mark Lord wrote:
david@xxxxxxx wrote:
actually, I think that while you may be able to get away with only one
kernel, you are probably better off with two. on the hibernate kernel you
can choose many 'embedded' options that don't make sense for the normal
kernel (no high mem, no SMP support, no SELinux, no network routing, not
netfilter, use SLOB not SLAB/SLUB, etc). also keep in mind that each
module that you load wastes apartial page of memory.
No highmem? No thanks.
I really want hibernate to save stuff from above 1GB as well
as the stuff below 1GB.
oops, good point. I was thinking that the hibernate kernel wouldn't need
that much ram for it's own operation and forgetting that it needed to
access everything the main system had.
David Lang
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm