Re: [PATCH 0/2] Kexec jump: The first step to kexec base hibernation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Mark Lord wrote:

david@xxxxxxx wrote:

 actually, I think that while you may be able to get away with only one
 kernel, you are probably better off with two. on the hibernate kernel you
 can choose many 'embedded' options that don't make sense for the normal
 kernel (no high mem, no SMP support, no SELinux, no network routing, not
 netfilter, use SLOB not SLAB/SLUB, etc). also keep in mind that each
 module that you load wastes apartial page of memory.

No highmem?  No thanks.

I really want hibernate to save stuff from above 1GB as well
as the stuff below 1GB.

oops, good point. I was thinking that the hibernate kernel wouldn't need that much ram for it's own operation and forgetting that it needed to access everything the main system had.

David Lang
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux