Re: [PATCH 0/2] Kexec jump: The first step to kexec base hibernation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> And the complexity and difficulty of setup really scares 
> me.
> Right now, we've got a pretty good/fast in-kernel (well, 
> external patch)
> that allows my machines to hibernate very quickly, wake 
> up even faster,
> and not swap like mad afterwards.  Without any external 
> programs,
> initramfs, or extra kernels required.
> 
> And we want to replace this with an ultra-complex setup 
> because.. ????

...freezer does not work with fuse :-). Or more exactly because
freezer is ugly, and we don't know how to get rid of it...

(Not that I advocate kexec-based hibernation. I think it is going to
suck. But it might allow kdump-but-keep-running, so work is not
wasted).
							Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux