Re: Re: hibernation/snapshot design [was Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nigel Cunningham writes:

> (Finally catching up on emails since Saturday!)

Yes, I know what you mean; I was occupied with other work stuff on
Friday and not well on Saturday, and by that stage there was a backlog
of about 500 emails for me to wade through... :/

> The freezer is also essential for doing a full image of memory - you
> have to be able to guarantee that some of the image won't change in
> order to be able to write it out before the atomic copy. Of course the
> freezer alone isn't enough, but it solves 95% of the issue.

Sure.  As I pointed out in another email, it's unrealistic to expect
the freezer to be able to stop everything in a state where any
arbitrary mutex is free.  But as long as you don't need to do anything
that depends on getting a mutex while the system is frozen, there
should be no problem.

Paul.
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux