Re: [PATCH] OLPC rtc-cmos support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday 08 July 2007, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:

> Like this? 

Not quite ...


> +struct resource rtc_platform_irq = {
> +	.flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
> +	.start = 8,
> +	.end = 8,
> +};

Unused, right?


> +static int olpc_rtc_init(void)

... should be marked __init ...

> +{
> +	rtc_info.rtc_day_alarm = 0;
> +	rtc_info.rtc_mon_alarm = 0;
> +	rtc_info.rtc_century = 0;
> +	rtc_info.wake_on = rtc_wake_on;
> +	rtc_info.wake_off = rtc_wake_off;

... that can all just be static init ...

> +
> +	(void)platform_device_register(&olpc_rtc_device);
> +
> +	device_init_wakeup(&olpc_rtc_device.dev, 1);

... do the init_wakeup before registering the device, so
there can never be confusion about whether a probe() will
see that part of device config ...

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +fs_initcall(olpc_rtc_init);

... and try to register platform devices in arch_initcall().
Just to avoid potential confusion; that's where it's normally
done, and I don't think you had a need to do it elsewhere.

- Dave



> +#endif /* CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS */
> +
>  static void olpc_pm_exit(void)
>  {
>  	/* Clear any pending events, and disable them */
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux