> On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 09:13 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > > Another myth, that has been debunked already. The problem is: how do > > you define fuse processes? There's no theoretical or even practial > > way to do that. > > It could if they told the kernel via some black magic ... > > But that still suck. The freezer sucks :-) Yeah, and it wouldn't work in practice, since the auxilary tasks might be part of a library which is not even aware of being used by a "fuse task". Miklos _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
