Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 04:09:24PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Thursday, 5 July 2007 15:46, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> > I have a model for STD that avoids the need to freeze the entirity of >> > userspace, but I need to find some more time to flesh it out. >> >> You can just describe it, as far as I'm concerned. :-) > > The basic model is that nobody's really described a use-case where we > actually care about restoring system state. What people want is to be > able to restore application state. So, arguably, what we want isn't to > save the entire kernel state and application state in one go because we > can reconstruct a huge amount of that afterwards. [...] > I've mocked up a basic implementation using cryopid, but it's somewhat > limited by the lack of support for sockets. I'd like to move more of > the smarts into the kernel (Hurray, checkpointing!) and then see how > much hardware support ends up horifically broken. You might want to look at the checkpoint / migration support in the OpenVZ kernel in relation to this. That does work to dump the state of a running "virtual environment" complete with applications to disk, move it to another running kernel and restore the content. That might, perhaps, help with the prototype of this? Regards, Daniel _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
