On Thursday, 5 July 2007 16:39, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 04:41:39PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday, 5 July 2007 16:26, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 04:28:11PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Thursday, 5 July 2007 15:57, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > > > And also "Userland should not depend on userland services", which is > > > > > rather more of a problem. > > > > > > > > I think you're oversimplifying it, as far as FUSE is concerned. > > > > > > > > Namely, if there are two userland tasks, A and B, and B is uninterruptible, > > > > because A is blocked, then this is not a usual situation. > > > > > > Fuse is one case of it occuring, and if we end up with more userspace > > > drivers then the problem is only going to get worse. > > > > But this is a problem by itself, regardless of the freezer etc., no? > > Why? You have processes that don't react to signals, because some other user land task is misbehaving. I'd call that ugly at the very least. Greetings, Rafael -- "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
