On Thursday, 5 July 2007 15:50, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > > Don't you think, however, that it can be modified a little to play well, > > > > for example, with the freezer? > > > > > > I could stick a couple of try_to_freeze()s into fuse, and that would > > > make suspend failure less likely. But making problems less easy to > > > reproduce is not a good thing. > > > > So, how about eliminating them? > > That can't be done just within fuse, a process might be sleeping on a > VFS mutex. Do we want to hack VFS as well? No. > I guess I know your answer. But it ain't gonna work. Suspend code > really doesn't belong in VFS, and I'm pretty sure the maintainers of > that little piece of code would agree with me on this. Surprise, surprise. Not that I'm scared of the VFS maintainers, though. ;-) Greetings, Rafael -- "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
