Rafael J. Wysocki writes: > This is incompatible with the code in kernel/power/main.c, since we only > disable the nonboot CPUs after devices have been suspended. Do you think that > your framework can be modified to work without disabling the nonboot CPUs > by the user space? Sure. It was a "if it can be done in userspace, do it in userspace" kind of decision, but I'm not wedded to it. I actually do want to converge to using the generic suspend-to-ram code on powerbooks. I just want to avoid causing regressions for powerbook users, including myself. :) Paul. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
