On Wednesday, 4 July 2007 21:52, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Sun 2007-07-01 20:54:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > > > > Introduce the pm_power_off_prepare() callback that can be registered by the > > interested platforms in analogy with pm_idle() and pm_power_off(), used for > > preparing the system to power off (needed by ACPI). > > > > This allows us to drop acpi_sysclass and device_acpi that are only defined in > > order to register the ACPI power off preparation callback, which is needed by > > pm_power_off() registered in a much different way. > > Well, the acpi way works with more than one piece of code "listening" > for powerdowns... and does not seem that ugly to me. > > Okay, so accessing system_state is not _that_ nice... aha, and perhaps > I understand why 1/2 of this series is right... it called prepare for > S4 even when we had shutdown in /sys/power/disk, right? > > Hmm. Okay, I think I can ACK both of these patches, but ACPI people > should have chance to comment, and it probably needs to stay in -mm > for a while. Well, linux-acpi in on the CC list and I see no comments from them. :-) Greetings, Rafael -- "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
