On Tuesday, 3 July 2007 09:37, Romano Giannetti wrote: > On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 05:29 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > or alternatively we could do what we do for suspend to RAM on other > > platforms (PPC and APM) and just not use the freezer. > > As a data point, I am running with this patch on top of 2.6.21.2 the > last 3+ weeks, with an average of 5/6 STR cycles a day, and had no > problems at all. (Sony vaio pcg-fx701). Just normal work, I didn't try > to stress the thing, but I have quite a few times suspended/resumed over > a big compile without a glitch. > > What are the risks of this patch supposed to be? See https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2007-June/012847.html Greetings, Rafael -- "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
