Re: 2.6.22-rcX Transmeta/APM regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 30 June 2007 05:03, linux@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Anyway, the patch which introduces the problem is the aptly named 3ebad:
> 3ebad59056: [PATCH] x86: Save and restore the fixed-range MTRRs of the BSP
> when suspending
>
> 2.6.22-rc6 plus that one commit reverted successfully does APM suspend
> (and resume) for me.

Mr.Linux, Does that patch fix it? 

-Andi

i386: Check if CPU has MTRRs before trying to save them

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>

Index: linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c
+++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c
@@ -734,8 +734,11 @@ void mtrr_ap_init(void)
  */
 void mtrr_save_state(void)
 {
-	int cpu = get_cpu();
+	int cpu;
 
+	if (!cpu_has_mtrr)
+		return;
+	cpu  = get_cpu();
 	if (cpu == 0)
 		mtrr_save_fixed_ranges(NULL);
 	else


_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux