On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 16:14 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Elimar, can you modify the code to > > do_div(elapsed_centisecs64, (s64) NSEC_PER_SEC / 100); That wouldn't help since the u64 is hardcoded. Changing elapsed_centisecs64 to s64 should help but doesn't seem right either. The warning is just bogus. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
