On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 15:50 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > The message seems to be a false-positive (this printk has been removed > recently, in 2.6.22-rc3, IIRC). > > We don't freeze traced tasks the parents of which have been frozen. So, in > fact, the evolution wasn't frozen, only the gdb that traced it, and during the > resume the gdb was thawed and allowed evolution to run, but it crashed. Ah, that makes sense, thanks for the explanation. > Why it crashed is a different problem, actually, and that need not be related > to the freezer. Still, if that turns out to be reproducible, I'll start to worry. ;-) Well, I suppose it then crashed right before I suspended, gdb attached, was frozen, and then I only saw that when I resumed. And evolution really kills itself all the time without the freezer too ;) johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
