Re: Re: [PATCH] swsusp: do not use pm_ops (was: Re: ...))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 9 May 2007, David Brownell wrote:

> > > > From the user's point of view, the differences between S4 and S5 amount to
> > > > just these: power consumption and availability of wakeup devices.
> > > 
> > > And the fact that in S4 there's always a resumable OS image.

> > What happens if the OS writes a resumable OS image and goes into S4, and 
> > then the user unplugs the computer, plugs it back in, and turns the power 
> > switch on?  At that point the system must be in S5 (by definition), but 
> > there's still a resumable image.
> 
> As allowed by the chapter 2 text I pointed out earlier.
> S4 *always* has such an image.

So the correct statement is that S4 always has a resumable OS image and S5
may have a resumable image.  From a user's point of view that doesn't
sound like much of a difference, especially since the image can be 
successfully restored from either state.

Alan Stern

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux