Re: Re: [PATCH] swsusp: do not use pm_ops (was: Re: suspend2 merge (was: Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday, 5 May 2007 23:43, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sat, 5 May 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > > I'm also pointing out that the policy choice decided by the contents of 
> > > /sys/power/disk comes into play during steps 6-7 above, but not at all in 
> > > steps 1-5.  Hence any associated software structures should explicitly be 
> > > connected only with steps 6 and 7.
> > 
> > At present, this policy choice does affect the earlier steps too.
> 
> Isn't this then another aspect of hibernation needing to be fixed?  Or is 
> there some genuine reason I'm not aware of that the choice of shutdown 
> method should affect those steps?

Well, I think it should be fixed, but I'm afraid that'll take a *lot* of time.

Greetings,
Rafael
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux