On Sat, 5 May 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > In addition we may want to have early/late variations on these (for use > > after interrupts have been disabled), which would lead to: > > > > pre_snapshot() > > pre_snapshot_late() > > post_snapshot_early() > > post_snapshot() > > pre_restore() > > pre_restore_late() > > post_restore_early() > > post_restore() > > > > Yes, it's a large list... But it seems to be necessary for providing all > > the information drivers will need. > > I think we may need yet another callback, executed before pre_snapshot() > and before we shrink memory during the hibernation, to be used by drivers > that need a lot of additional memory in pre_snapshot(). pre_snapshot_early() Alan Stern _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
