On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 11:46 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Well, BUG_ON() is extremely user-unfriendly, and it'd trigger even if the user > actually didn't intend to suspend at all. Well, hibernation_set_ops is invoked whenever the user loads his ACPI module with S4 possible, and typically having a BUG_ON here will make the developers who wrote the code that calls hibernation_set_ops see it right away while they might miss the message. I don't care much though, it just seems wasteful to have this string in there when it'll never be seen by anyone but the developers who create new hibernation_ops. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
