Hi, * Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [070428 00:53]: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:12:26 +0400 > Dmitry Krivoschekov <dmitry.krivoschekov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Johannes Berg wrote: > > > This patch kills some useless code omap1/omap2. > > Although the change looks harmless it'd be nice CC-ing > > appropriate "arch" or "mach" lists. > > > > Added omap list to CC. > > > > BTW, you change OMAP stuff only, so your subject is slightly irrelevant. > > > > I'm not very comfortable handling OMAP code (Tony), ARM code (Russell) or > power-management code (Greg), and this patch is all three. Well this patch will probably cause some minor merge conflicts with the pending omap patches, not a big deal though. > So ho hum. I queued it up with Greg as the arbitrary target, but I'm not > sure that is really appopriate. Probably it should have been Tony, but > Tony's tree is hiding from me. The omap tree is available at [1] and the currently pending patches pile at [2]. > I guess we should look at dragging the OMAP git tree into -mm. I thought Russell is about to apply the pending omap patches to his tree, so let's wait until we hear from him. Assuming Russell applies the pending omap patches, things should be pretty much in sync with the mainline tree and linux-omap tree for the core omap support. There will be some driver and PM patches that would fit to -mm tree though. At least the voltage framework, and possibly the DSP code later on, come to mind. Regards, Tony [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git [2] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git omap-upstream-after-clocksource _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
