On Saturday 21 April 2007, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Sat, 2007-04-21 at 09:55 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > > > Or maybe arch_suspend_disable_irqs() ... there are PM > > operations that don't involve system suspend states. > > Yeah, probably better and I'm fine with that, but the crowd who screamed > when I noted that CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND had nothing to do with suspend > states might be confused... It should be obvious that this isn't called > for suspend to disk. Yeah, but SOFTWARE_SUSPEND is also a misnomer. It's more of a system checkpoint/restore framework. And even userspace makes that distinction clear, calling it "Hibernate" not "Suspend". I feel a Kconfig patch coming on ... ;) - Dave _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
