Re: [PATCH] s2ram: add arch irq disable/enable hooks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:00:11 +0200
Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> For powermac, we need to do some things between suspending devices and
> device_power_off, for example setting the decrementer. This patch
> allows architectures to define arch_s2ram_{en,dis}able_irqs in their
> asm/suspend.h to have control over this step.
> 

what on earth is a decrementer?

> 
> ---
>  kernel/power/main.c |   14 ++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> --- wireless-dev.orig/kernel/power/main.c	2007-04-17 18:52:24.536830941 +0200
> +++ wireless-dev/kernel/power/main.c	2007-04-17 19:09:40.966830941 +0200
> @@ -128,13 +128,22 @@ static int suspend_prepare(suspend_state
>  	return error;
>  }
>  
> +#ifndef arch_s2ram_disable_irqs
> +#define arch_s2ram_disable_irqs(flags) local_irq_save(*flags)
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef arch_s2ram_enable_irqs
> +#define arch_s2ram_enable_irqs(flags) local_irq_restore(*flags)
> +#endif
> +
>  
>  int suspend_enter(suspend_state_t state)
>  {
>  	int error = 0;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
> -	local_irq_save(flags);
> +	arch_s2ram_disable_irqs(&flags);

hm, ugly.  We could use attribute(weak) here, so we don't force
architectures to implement this with a macro.  But whatever.


It might be nice to identify which arch header is supposed to define
arch_s2ram_disable_irqs, perhaps via an explicit inclusion of that header.

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux