> Hmm, I missed that. :-( > > I think we need to make things clear: Either we add the additional hooks to > pm_ops in which case they should be taken into account in the (u)swsusp code > too, or we don't add them at all. > > Well, there also is one more solution. Namely, we can add the hooks to pm_ops > and make (u)swsusp use something else instead of pm_ops, but that would require > some more consideration. Well, what would be nice would be if swsusp wasn't just such a gross contraption completely bypassing the rest of the suspend/resume framework... Ben. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
