On Sat 2007-04-14 00:13:26, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 00:09 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Hmm, I missed that. :-( > > > > I think we need to make things clear: Either we add the additional hooks to > > pm_ops in which case they should be taken into account in the (u)swsusp code > > too, or we don't add them at all. > > I can do that. I don't care one bit since I will never use pm_ops for > suspend to disk anyway. Please don't do that just yet. I see ppc as being really special here. Normally, preparation for s2ram and preparation for snapshot is really similar, but you have exception to that rule. I do think clean solution is redesigning plaform/sysdevs to have stable order. If you added one platform and one sysdev, would that _work_? AFAICT you say it would and Ben says it would not. (Lets leave uglyness debate for later). Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
