Hi! > > Hmm, and can't you simply create sysdev for decrementer and special > > platform handling? sysdevs should be suspended last... > > In theory, yes. > > In practise, however, it seems to be impossible to get a sysdev into the > queue that is suspended before any other sysdevs are suspended (i.e. > right after interrupts are disabled) > > And then there are the platform functions. In theory, they could be done > with a regular struct device, but in practice they need to be the very > last thing before interrupts are disabled, and that again is impossible > to achieve. Is it feasible to improve sysdev handling to allow this? -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
