On Wednesday 04 April 2007 2:49 pm, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 11:44 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > > > I'm not sure I understand the question. ACPI has a special "acpi_device" > > node (not backed by any "real" device, PNPACPI etc) with a driver that > > hooks up to the input subsystem. Same is true for a couple other fixed > > function buttons. I'd expect non-ACPI platforms would do something very > > similar, except using platform_device and looking less cryptic. > > No, the thing is more: how would we represent the lid as a device in > sysfs? As a platform_device. > Currently, our PMU only has a sysdev because it doesn't need > more. Would you suggest doing a PMU-bus and than hanging "lid" off of > that? Avoid doing a new bus_type unless you **really, really** need one. - Dave _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
