On Monday 02 April 2007 12:40 pm, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 11:24:21AM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > > > I don't follow this at all. Most of the relevant devices have a PCI > > device driver, not an ACPI device driver. Surely you aren't proposing > > that PCI drivers should incorporate lots of ACPI-specific code (which > > won't be useful on non-ACPI platforms) before they start to work right? > > PCI devices have a handle to their ACPI object in platform_data, Good to know. I was under the impression that was still in the planning stage, not yet the working/reliable stage. But I do see some ACPI code doing that; maybe I'll take more of a look. > so it's > easy enough to have generic code that interacts with both objects. Well, not really "generic" if it knows about ACPI. But at least not device-specific. > > For a PCI device driver, pci_enable_wake() is all the hook that it should > > ever need. If ACPI magic is needed, it should be called from inside that > > routine. > > Yeah, I don't see that being a problem. Except for not yet working that way! ;) - Dave _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
