On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 06:33:20PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 09:09 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > > While I agree in principle with the patch, I'm a bit uncomfortable. The > > > sys device suspend / resume ordering is not guaranteed and relies on the > > > registering order. > > > > Well, this is why we probably should try to get away from the "system > > device" issue, exactly because system devices are totally outside the > > normal ordering and only have a random linear order. > > > > If the clocksources were actually in the device tree, you'd get all the > > normal guarantees about hierarchical ordering.. > > Right, but clock - sources/events need to be extremly late suspended and > early resumed. How can we ensure this ? Put it at the top of the device tree. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
