On Wednesday 28 March 2007 22:59:26 David Brownell wrote: > On Wednesday 28 March 2007 1:19 pm, Maxim wrote: > > On Wednesday 28 March 2007 21:38:55 David Brownell wrote: > > > > > > > Also, making HPET use the legacy mode seems like a step backwards. > > > It is not 'legacy' mode, > > It is a legacy replacement mode. > > Typo, sorry. > > > > It this mode HPET takes over IRQ0 and IRQ 8 and provides this way > > replacement for PIT and RTC periodic function > > It's that RTC periodic thing that bothers me, I don't mind about > the PIT. Remember that IRQ8 is also used for other RTC functions. > > Now, if there were a way to tell rtc-cmos that HPET is active, > and arrange some kind of handshake ... that would be different. > > - Dave > Yes, When HPET is active it eats RTC IRQ, So the only way out is to emulate RTC using HPET, It is done this way in old rtc driver, rtc-cmos should do the same. Of course suspend resume is not supported at all by old rtc driver I already wrote complete support for suspend/resume for old rtc driver (I wrote it long time ago) Now I fixed it to support HPET , and this way I discovered that HPET doesn't have suspend resume functions I will do last checks now and send this patch very soon I am also planning to add support of HPET and suspend/resume for rtc-cmos, but I didn't start this yet. Best regards, Maxim Levitsky _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
