Re: [PATCH] implement pm_ops.valid for everybody

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 23 March 2007 5:01 pm, Pavel Machek wrote:

> > tell drivers what to do.  Say we use something like PMSG_STANDBY and now
> 
> We would add another field to that struct, distingushing "mem" and
> "standby". 

Just for the record:  I continue to oppose growing pm_message_t.
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux