On Thu 2007-03-22 15:18:34, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 22. März 2007 14:56 schrieb Pavel Machek: > > > > Generic entry points are for _system_ suspend, and if you try to abuse > > > > them for runtime PM, you'll have to audit/change all the drivers. > > > > > > Is this your position regarding USB autosuspend, too? Should we use > > > other methods than suspend/resume? > > > > Well, you should have audited USB drivers when enabling autosuspend... > > But I believe you did that so you are pretty much okay. > > We audited them. Respectively, are auditing them. Ok. (It would be nice to document 'USB suspend/resume routines are called during runtime, too' somewhere. > > (With autosuspend, you can get situation when request from userland > > comes in even when device is suspended; some devices will need > > fixing). > > Currently, such requests are ignored. Is there any problem with that? You should probably autowake such device, no? So USB stick sits unused for 10minutes and autosuspend. I want to read the USB stick. Stick needs to autowakeup, me thinks. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
