Re: [RFC] dynamic device power management proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Donnerstag, 22. März 2007 14:39 schrieb Scott E. Preece:
> There's nothing contrived or corner-case-ish about cyclic operations in
> a world where media players, animations, etc., are utterly commonplace.
> And latency may be ignorable in a laptop environment, but it absolutely
> isn't in embedded devices, which users expect to operate immediately, as
> though they were gear-driven rather than computer-driven.

USB currently uses a delay and a switch in sysfs. Devices that have
several power saving levels would also need an attribute to specify that.
Is that acceptable?

	Regards
		Oliver

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux