Hi! > > (And trust me, we can flame them if not). > > > > (Anyway, my definition would be "mem" == RAM is powered, everything > > else is down, except for devices needed for wakeup; "standby" == > > something is powered that can be powered down, we'll fix that in next version). > > That implies that standby is less desirable, and wouldn't be used much. > > That's a false implication. Among other things, it may be more important > to have various wakeup event sources at moderate power, than to go > without them at lower power. Simple math: N hours at 75% power savings, > which lets the system become fully operational at any time; versus those > same hours at 0% power savings (full power), because STR (90% savings) > doesn't support some essential wakeup events. I guess we are violently agreeing. See my "except for devices needed for wakeup". I should not have added the "next version" note, as "standby" is useful, too. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
