"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> writes: > On Tuesday, 20 March 2007 22:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Tuesday, 20 March 2007 21:58, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> > Rafael J. Wysocki napsal(a): >> > > Actually, the problem is 100% reproducible on my system too and I doubt > it's >> > > caused by the recent freezer patches. >> > >> > I don't know what exactly do you mean by recent, but 2.6.21-rc3-mm2 works >> > for me. >> >> Thanks for the confirmation. >> >> The patches I was talking about had already been in 2.6.21-rc3-mm2, so the >> reason of this failure must be different. > > Bisection shows that the freezing of processes has been broken by one of the > patches: > > remove-the-likelypid-check-in-copy_process.patch Grr. Oleg's review of remove-the-likelypid-check-in-copy-process showed it to be questionable (and it was just an optimization) so we can get rid of that one easily. Although all it did that was really questionable was add the idle process to the global process list and bump a process count when we forked the idle process. Not dramatically dangerous things. > use-task_pgrp-task_session-in-copy_process.patch As I recall that patch was pretty trivial, and shouldn't have anything to do with the freezer. The process freezer doesn't care about pids does it? Eric _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
