Re: [PATCH/RFC] PCI prepare/activate instead of enable to avoid IRQ storm and rogue DMA access

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Russell King wrote:
> In any case, relying on such a new control bit to implement this kind
> of functionality would result in a very hit and miss result; Linux

How does Tejun's patch or thesis rely on this new control bit?  He 
explicitly mentions DISABLE_INTX variability...

	Jeff


_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux