Hi, On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 12:08:51PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Perhaps first step would be to convert cpufreq to this new framework? Actually, cpufreq doesn't need to be modified (at least at first). This new framework can coexist nicely with cpufreq and this framework can export its capabilities to cpufreq governors (and, possibly, cpuidle governors) if it so wishes. Only in the mid- to long-term, changes to cpufreq might make sense. But that's something I cannot predict accurately ;) Thanks, Dominik _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
