Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> > Ok. To be honest, you are the first reporter that seems to have read 
> > the documentation above, but not understood what to do.
> 
> thanks for the compliment ;-) _I_ very much know what to do (i mailed 
> the right person after all ;), but i dont really count and on the 6 

(Can we get the whitelist entries?)

> > i might consider reworking the documentation if there are more reports 
> > about problems with the procedure.
> 
> Probably tweaking the webpage doesnt help because people dont get there 
> - as the results plainly show it. Maybe some more automation would be 
> useful too, a tool that detects failed resume and tries all those 
> options that makes sense on that box or something? It's not like
> that 

Unfortunately, these tend to crash the box when you pass wrong
options, and I do not see easy way to test "can user see whats on
display" automatically.

Feel free to send patches, but I do not think it is easy/possible.

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux