On Wednesday 13 December 2006 1:03 pm, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Wed 2006-12-13 15:12:07, Eugeny S. Mints wrote: > > David Brownell wrote: > > > On Tuesday 19 September 2006 11:25 am, Pavel Machek wrote: > > >> Could you perhaps provide list of operating points for 770? It would > > >> help understanding a bit, I'd say. > > > > > > If there was a followup here, I missed it ... > > > > > > ISTR that it doesn't use (formal) operating points, and that a lot of the > > > basic SOC power savings (vs powering off the display or wifi) come from a > > > different kind of mechanism entirely. Namely, a combination of dynamic > > > tick with a modified system idle task, which enters one of the OMAP low > > > power modes during those long periods between clock ticks or other irqs. > > > > > > That's one of the standard power saving schemes used on OMAP1 platforms > > > with Linux. > > > sample of reasonable operating points for OMAP1 platforms along with appropriate > > patches may be found at http://dynamicpower.sourceforge.net/dpm-omap.html That's the old DPM stuff not any of the newer proposals right? I thought the question was specifically what N770 used. > Okay... so you have system with 4 different cpu speeds. That should be > simple enough to get running using cpufreq, no need for complex > operating points patches. And OMAP1 does have cpufreq support. I believe that if I checked it out I'd find that it's used on N770, as a good way to kick in low voltage operation modes. ... that's in addition to the reduced power idle, which didn't seem to fit into the DPM framework in any obvious way. - Dave
