Hi, On Saturday, 9 December 2006 00:36, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > I wonder if we should start a test suite ;-). > > > > > > > > > This means, however, that with this patch the behavior of a process (gdb) > > > > > after the resume may be different to its normal behavior, which is wrong. > > > > > > > > Yep. > > > > Okay, I think I know what to do so that it works. The above symptoms are not > > present with the appended patch. > > Looks good to me. Thanks for you work! Well, there's still a race possible in there, if SIGCONT comes after we have forced the SIGSTOP and before we call signal_wake_up(). I think we should force the SIGSTOP and call signal_wake_up() without releasing the lock. I'll try to do something along these lines later today. Greetings, Rafael -- If you don't have the time to read, you don't have the time or the tools to write. - Stephen King
