Hi guys. On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 00:45 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > ...after resume. > > > > > > This is because of how signal_wake_up() works, I think.. > > > > > > > But I think it is right approach. > > > > Okay, with the appended patch applied everything seems to work and I don't > > see any undesirable side-effects. > > I promise to try it... tommorow. Looks very good to me. Just to say sorry for my lack of interaction / feedback. Too busy with other stuff at the moment, but I'm trying to keep track :) Nigel
