On Wednesday 01 November 2006 07:18, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at mellanox.co.il>: > > What I plan to do is using eea0e11c1f0d6ef89e64182b2f1223a4ca2b74a2 > > for a couple of days and see how this works out. > > Ugh. Unfortunately in that kernel version, the e1000 driver says > the eeprom checksum is bad (works fine with 2.6.19-rc3). > So, I tried some suspends/resumes and things seem to work, but > I won't be able to test it under real use conditions. > > But maybe its another red herring? > Andi, could you maybe look at that commit and tell me whether > it could cause troubles with ACPI after suspend/resume even > theoretically? It touches suspend/resume so it could break something theoretically. -Andi
