On Wed 2006-11-01 08:18:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at mellanox.co.il>: > > What I plan to do is using eea0e11c1f0d6ef89e64182b2f1223a4ca2b74a2 > > for a couple of days and see how this works out. > > Ugh. Unfortunately in that kernel version, the e1000 driver says > the eeprom checksum is bad (works fine with 2.6.19-rc3). > So, I tried some suspends/resumes and things seem to work, but > I won't be able to test it under real use conditions. Just comment out the eeprom checksum check... Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
