Hi! > F) So, how would this work for OMAP1? > > Let's limit it, to keep it somewhat simple, to the values contained in your > "struct pm_core_point" for OMAP: > > int cpu_vltg; /* voltage in mV */ > int dpll; /* in KHz */ > int cpu; /* CPU frequency in KHz */ > int tc; /* in KHz */ > int per; /* in KHz */ > int dsp; /* in KHz */ > int dspmmu; /* in KHz */ > int lcd; /* in KHz */ > > and let's also add a > > int i_am_special; Hehe, nice idea. > I think that this might be much easier to implement than your PowerOP / > operating points / PM core / PowerOP - cpufreq interaction patches. As a > matter of fact, some parts of your operating points table infrastructure > may be usable for the concept outlined above. So, what do you think? What > does everyone else involved think about this alternative approach? Looks okay to me. Unlike powerop design, this actually works for everyone. -- Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.
