On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 08:38:52PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Sun 2006-10-01 14:36:07, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 02:28:19PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > Well, IMHO, making the module load when we know it won't work is a hack > > > in the first place. :-) > > > > That's just it, we *don't* know if it'll work or not until we load it. > > Okay... but keeping it loaded (when it is unused) to silence some > warnings is stupid / hack. Can we teach userland to ignore the fact > that module failed to load, for example? Sounds like a good idea. Dave
