[linux-pm] So, what's the status on the recent patches here?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> > The frequency of entering this state should not interfere with my active
> > use case.
> > 
> > -B- After I've put down the USB device, I now can program the internal
> > SOC bus wrapper for the USB to allow idling of the interconnect.  I also
> > need to associate the USB remote wake interrupt with a wake up interrupt
> > to restart my interconnect.  All devices on that interconnect must be in
> > the same state for the big savings to happen.
> > 
> > Certainly for this embedded system, not coordinating the device states
> > means I can't get the big power savings.
> 
> Part of this programming has to be done in the architecture-specific
> driver for the interconnect.  There already is code being developed to
> suspend USB buses when they aren't in use (although determining _when_
> they aren't in use has not yet been implemented).  However this code
> stops

Are there some patches to test? I'd like to power down USB bus, even
when it has device connected (I do not user fingerprint scanner that
much).
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux