Just to be clear.... I think the most important part to review and agree to is the powerop interface and implementation. We can always add the right userspace interface for creation (if agreed to), suspend/resume integration, etc later. On Aug 8, 2006, at 8:53 AM, Matthew Locke wrote: > > On Aug 8, 2006, at 6:52 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > >> Anyway, lets get in core first, than talk about userspace interface >> for chanig operating points, ok? > > Sounds like we are all in agreement on this point:) Hopefully we can > get agreement or some sort of conclusion on the latest interface we > have presented (by Eugeny). Once we get agreement there, we can start > pushing powerop to andrew and then start working/discussing the other > features necessary. > >> Pavel >> -- >> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek >> (cesky, pictures) >> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html >> _______________________________________________ >> linux-pm mailing list >> linux-pm at lists.osdl.org >> https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm >> > > _______________________________________________ > linux-pm mailing list > linux-pm at lists.osdl.org > https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm >
