On Jul 24, 2006, at 12:35 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > >>> But better run this by lkml. >> >> I'd rather see some rough consensus on this list that this is the >> right way >> to head, before running things like this by LKML. > > I meant "they could suggest how to do the sysfs thing, in reasonable > way". Like echo new_config > file is extermely ugly, but perhaps > configfs > is suitable? Ah, Is that what you consider ugly, that each parameter is a sysfs file and the values have to be written to a file to set it up? We can look into configfs and ask lkml (or specific people) for recommendations on the best mechanism to use.
