On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 01:13:03PM -0700, Gross, Mark wrote: > >AS FAR AS I CAN TELL the patch won't actually change any behaviour (I > have > >actually been running for the last few days with the separate patch > that > >_does_ do that - moves the PCI config suspend/resume to the late/early > >rsume phase), but hey, mistakes happen. > > > > Shouldn't this type of thing go through the MM-tree first for these > reasons? Good point, that's probably the correct way to do this for such a core change. thanks, greg k-h