Hi! (Sorry, I'm trying to be on holidays -- 11 horses to play with and big email backlog). > > Any thoughts as to applying your patch to the tree or not? No objection > > from me if you want to. > > I've not actually had anybody report any testing success from it, and > since I don't use suspend-to-disk, for example, if would be good to have > verification. > > AS FAR AS I CAN TELL the patch won't actually change any behaviour (I have > actually been running for the last few days with the separate patch that > _does_ do that - moves the PCI config suspend/resume to the late/early > rsume phase), but hey, mistakes happen. > Anyway, this is the current patch (rebased to current git, and with the > same "list_move[_tail]()" cleanups that mainline got independently). Does > anybody see any remaining problems in it? And can somebody who runs > suspend-to-disk verify that that still works (I don't see why it wouldn't, > but still..) I quickly tried it on my system and it does not seem to break anything. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
