On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, Adam Belay wrote: > > P.S.: Linus, what are your thoughts on passing a mirror image of the suspend > callbacks we provide (or will provide) for the device interface to the class > device interface? In other words, allow it to also get suspend_prepare(), > resume_finish(), etc. to encourage the sort of abstraction suggested above. I don't think the suspend_late() case in particular makes much sense (what could a class do at that late a point?), but I'm certainly not against it if people figure out a real use. I'd like the current single entry-point to be made usable first, though. Right now it "exists", but I don't think you can necessarily use it because the class doesn't necessarily have a mapping from "struct device" to whatever class instance it's a class of. (That might depend on the class, of course, I didn't really look into it) Linus
