On Friday 23 June 2006 11:32 am, Alan Stern wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, David Brownell wrote: > > > On Thursday 22 June 2006 1:31 pm, Alan Stern wrote: > > > I believe this has been fixed for quite a while. > > > > That's been said, but nonetheless the last few times I've tried to do > > things like handling disconnect processing anything other than very > > late (after khubd got woken up again), it was still deadlocksville. > > Yes, this is _after_ folk have said "this has been fixed...". > > Okay, I have tried it. Hmm, when I tried that, I did it on suspend() paths not resume, and the deadlocks were in PM core code. I didn't see that SCSI bug. Maybe it really is fixed now. > ... > The devices actually get removed twice: once during the "resume so we can > write out the memory image" phase and then once again during the actual > final resume. ... albeit still strange. - Dave
